🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in other member states