🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are channeling enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating their own artificial intelligence systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, states are competing to build AI that grasps native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Battle

This movement is an element in a broader international competition led by tech giants from the America and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and Meta pour substantial capital, mid-sized nations are likewise taking their own bets in the AI field.

However given such huge sums at stake, is it possible for developing countries secure notable benefits? According to a analyst from a prominent research institute, Except if you’re a rich nation or a major company, it’s a substantial hardship to develop an LLM from nothing.”

Security Concerns

Many states are reluctant to depend on external AI models. In India, for instance, American-made AI tools have at times fallen short. An illustrative case involved an AI agent deployed to instruct students in a isolated area – it spoke in English with a strong American accent that was difficult to follow for local students.

Then there’s the defence dimension. In India’s defence ministry, using particular foreign AI tools is viewed unacceptable. Per an developer noted, It's possible it contains some unvetted training dataset that could claim that, such as, a certain region is not part of India … Utilizing that certain model in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He further stated, I’ve consulted individuals who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they don’t even want to rely on US technologies because data may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Projects

As a result, several countries are supporting local initiatives. An example this project is being developed in India, in which a company is striving to build a national LLM with government funding. This project has dedicated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert foresees a model that is less resource-intensive than top-tier systems from American and Asian firms. He notes that the country will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with expertise. “Being in India, we lack the luxury of pouring massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the hundreds of billions that the United States is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the brain game plays a role.”

Local Focus

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is funding machine learning tools developed in the region's regional languages. Such dialects – such as Malay, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and more – are frequently underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the people who are building these national AI systems were aware of the extent to which and the speed at which the leading edge is advancing.

A leader engaged in the initiative notes that these models are created to enhance more extensive AI, rather than substituting them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he states, commonly struggle with native tongues and local customs – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, for example, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malaysian consumers.

Building native-tongue LLMs permits local governments to incorporate cultural nuance – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a powerful technology created in other countries.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the word national. I think what we’re attempting to express is we want to be better represented and we want to understand the capabilities” of AI systems.

Cross-Border Collaboration

For countries trying to establish a position in an escalating international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Analysts connected to a prominent university have suggested a government-backed AI initiative shared among a group of developing states.

They term the initiative “Airbus for AI”, modeled after the European successful strategy to develop a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. This idea would see the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the capabilities of several countries’ AI programs – for example the UK, Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the US and Chinese major players.

The lead author of a study setting out the concept notes that the proposal has gained the consideration of AI officials of at least a few states so far, along with multiple sovereign AI organizations. Although it is currently targeting “developing countries”, developing countries – Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have likewise expressed interest.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the commitments of the present American government. People are asking for example, should we trust any of this tech? In case they opt to